Of Quraysh and Change
Why Are Customs that Aren't Etched in Stone So Hard to Alter?
In Samuel Beckett's famous
play Waiting for Godot, the
protagonists, Vladimir, "Didi," and Estragon, "Gogo,"
embody the in flexibility of human nature to change. In the final
conversation between Didi and Gogo in Waiting
for Godot, the two characters discuss their plans for the next day:
hanging themselves. They tried to do it that day, but they were unsuccessful at
even that action. In the scenes leading up to this one, they have not
succeeded in making any progress in helping their tragic yet comedic
situation. Their last lines read:
DIDI: Well? Shall we go?
GOGO: Yes, let’s go.
[They do not move.] (Beckett 83)
Didi and Gogo stay next to the same
“low mound” (3) the entire play. The play ends, and they stand where they
started, where Gogo takes off his boots, symbolizing the lack of development
the characters have in the play.
In both incidences, the youth in the society is more accepting of change than the elder crowd. The elders are used to one thing and then the youth wish to separate themselves from the older generations. This makes sense. Both in media and in religious and/or historical texts, there is evidence to support that humans do not receive change well. My question is: why? What makes human nature so opposed to change?
No comments:
Post a Comment